Um, this is the problem as Google has pointed out. The only way Google can do what Conrad is asking (and god do I hate that man) is to implement a system like what they have with China. They'd have to create a filter based on keywords and tags and I assume also based on people dobbing sites in somehow. Maybe they have something more high tech to pick up audio words, not sure. Not pretty anyway.
This is the same guy that has slipped in and got through a bill that black lists a bunch of websites that all Australian web providers will now be forced to block. The list was leaked and the sites aren't all things you'd assume would be blocked by Australian authorities. There was even a dental practice in there. WTF? And of course the question arises as to who gets to decide what else becomes "black-listed" etc.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-13 10:23 pm (UTC)This is the same guy that has slipped in and got through a bill that black lists a bunch of websites that all Australian web providers will now be forced to block. The list was leaked and the sites aren't all things you'd assume would be blocked by Australian authorities. There was even a dental practice in there. WTF? And of course the question arises as to who gets to decide what else becomes "black-listed" etc.